"It is easy to read the Supreme Court�s 5-to-4 decision in Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama as a mostly inconsequential case..."

"... giving a small, and perhaps only temporary, victory for minority voters in a dispute over the redrawing of Alabama�s legislative districts after the 2010 census," writes Richard Hasen at SCOTUSblog.

Indeed, although the Supreme Court sent this �racial gerrymandering� case back for a wide and broad rehearing before a three-judge court, Alabama will be free to junk its plan and start over with one that may achieve the same political ends and keep it out of legal trouble. But Justice Antonin Scalia in his dissent sees the majority as issuing �a sweeping holding that will have profound implications for the constitutional ideal of one person, one vote, for the future of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and for the primacy of the State in managing its own elections.� Time will tell if Justice Scalia�s warning against the implications of what he termed a �fantastical� majority opinion is more than typical Scalian hyperbole....

 ADDED: Here's the PDF of the opinion, which I can't read just yet.